Re: [idea] table partition + hash join

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [idea] table partition + hash join
Date: 2015-06-10 09:08:39
Message-ID: 5577FE97.1090807@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-06-10 PM 05:53, Atri Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:16 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp
>> wrote:
>
>>
>> Perhaps the qual needs to be pushed all the way down
>> to the Hash's underlying scan if that makes sense.
>>
>
> And that is a Pandora's box of troubles IMHO unless done in a very careful
> manner.
>

More appropriately, that's a predicate (should not have called it a qual)
derived from partitioning-optimization specific knowledge.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-10 11:02:53 Missing XLOG_DEBUG check in AdvanceXLInsertBuffer()?
Previous Message Atri Sharma 2015-06-10 08:53:27 Re: [idea] table partition + hash join