Re: Missed bet in toaster routines

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Missed bet in toaster routines
Date: 2004-01-16 18:44:00
Message-ID: 5576.1074278640@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be a win for heap_tuple_toast_attrs() to fall out quickly
>> if the tuple contains no varlena attributes?

> Why sure it would. That code is quite frequently called.

I take it back --- the short-circuit test already exists, but it's at
the call sites rather than in tuptoaster.c.

However, it looks like we can tighten the tests a bit. For instance
heap_delete invokes the toaster if HeapTupleHasExtended, whereas it
seems to me it'd be sufficient to check HasExternal --- we don't care
about deleting compressed-in-line stuff, do we?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edwin S. Ramirez 2004-01-16 20:06:09 update syntax
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2004-01-16 17:43:24 Re: cache control?