From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: alter column type |
Date: | 2015-06-05 20:00:22 |
Message-ID: | 5571FFD6.7090401@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/5/2015 11:46 AM, Casey Deccio wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
>
> Probably too late for this time, but in the past when I've needed
> to redefine the type for a column, I've made a dump, edited the
> dump file to change the type and then renamed the table and
> reloaded it. That's usually several orders of magnitude faster.
>
>
> Actually, not too late. My first ALTER is still running, and I still
> have four more to go. Sigh. I had thought of this but wasn't sure
> how it might compare. Thanks for the data point :)
if all 5 alters' were to the same table, you should have combined them
into one alter statement.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-06-05 20:02:37 | Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-05 19:42:52 | Re: alter column type |