| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode |
| Date: | 2015-06-05 18:39:47 |
| Message-ID: | 5571ECF3.9000605@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/05/2015 07:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> So let's call it an alpha, or some other way of setting expectations
> appropriately. But I think it's silly to maintain that the code is not in
> a state where end-user testing is useful. They just have to understand
> that they can't trust it with production data.
Yes ... that seems like a good compromise.
Frankly, I'm testing 9.5 already; having alpha packages would make that
testing easier for me, and maybe possible for others.
We'd need to take into account that our packagers are a bit overworked
this month due to update releases ...
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-06-05 18:47:33 | Re: [HACKERS] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-05 18:36:30 | Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |