Re: pg_dump -a strangeness/bug? (7.1beta5)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Antoine Reid <antoiner(at)hansonpublications(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump -a strangeness/bug? (7.1beta5)
Date: 2001-03-06 15:35:25
Message-ID: 5571.983892925@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> If someone goes there and fixes the code, maybe the code could be optimized
>> not to put any COPY at all for a table if it is empty?

> Maybe for 7.2.

A copy supplying no data isn't going to take a significant amount of
time. I don't think this is worth worrying about.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-03-06 15:57:30 Re: interface differences in the 7.0.3 version
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-03-06 15:21:35 Re: "select ... where field like lower('%text%')" fails