Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Date: 2015-06-04 16:33:34
Message-ID: 55707DDE.8070202@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/04/2015 08:55 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:

> Personally, I'd rather we publish a list of formally vetted and approved
> versions of PGXN modules. There are many benefits to that, and the
> downside of not having that stuff as part of make check would be
> overcome by the explicit testing we would need to have for approved
> modules.

I tried to come up with more words but: Exactly.

The benefit to this idea so far exceeds the benefit to having contrib.

Sincerely,

JD

--
The most kicking donkey PostgreSQL Infrastructure company in existence.
The oldest, the most experienced, the consulting company to the stars.
Command Prompt, Inc. http://www.commandprompt.com/ +1 -503-667-4564 -
24x7 - 365 - Proactive and Managed Professional Services!

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2015-06-04 16:34:23 Re: brin regression test intermittent failures
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-06-04 16:22:58 Re: brin regression test intermittent failures