From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-core <pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release |
Date: | 2015-06-03 17:56:40 |
Message-ID: | 556F3FD8.5000804@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/31/2015 03:51 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 5/30/15 8:38 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
>> On 05/30/2015 03:48 PM, David Steele wrote:
>>> On 5/30/15 2:10 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>> What, in this release, could break things badly? RLS? Grouping sets?
>>>> Heikki's WAL format changes? That last one sounds really scary to me;
>>>> it's painful if not impossible to fix the WAL format in a minor
>>>> release.
>>>
>>> I would argue Heikki's WAL stuff is a perfect case for releasing a
>>> public alpha/beta soon. I'd love to test PgBackRest with an "official"
>>> 9.5dev build. The PgBackRest test suite has lots of tests that run on
>>> versions 8.3+ and might well shake out any bugs that are lying around.
>>
>> You are right. Clone git, run it nightly automated and please, please
>> report anything you find. There is no reason for a tagged release for
>> that. Consider it a custom, purpose built, build-test farm.
>
> Sure - I can write code to do that. But then why release a beta at all?
FWIW: we also carry "official" snapshots on the download site (
https://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/snapshot/dev/) that you could use if you
dont want git directly - those even receive some form of QA (for a
snapshot to be posted it is required to pass a full buildfarm run on the
buildbox).
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-06-03 18:01:46 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-06-03 17:31:36 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |