From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch |
Date: | 2015-05-28 01:57:45 |
Message-ID: | 55667619.5060304@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 05/27/2015 06:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> As the only way to back up global objects is pg_dumpall....?
>
> Well, my point is that the roles could be set up separately by other
> means.
True but this is about pg_dump right? I mean contextually it doesn't
matter if they can issue a separate SQL command as we are talking about
getting a backup/dump that makes it so you don't have to issue a
separate SQL command.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-05-28 18:16:33 | Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-05-28 01:53:12 | Re: per feedback I received directly, pg_dump manpage patch |