| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Jon Erdman <jon(dot)erdman(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, David Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>, PostgreSQL in Debian <pgsql-pkg-debian(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pollux(at)debian(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pgtap in our apt repo |
| Date: | 2015-05-26 20:26:58 |
| Message-ID: | 5564D712.4080706@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-pkg-debian |
On 05/25/2015 09:03 PM, Christoph Berg wrote:
> For an arch:all package you could stuff all extensions into a single
> package and make symlinks for the duplicated files. I've done that for
> ... *search disk* ... pgagent.
Interesting.. just a couple days ago I started to work on PGAPT-ing
pgtap as well. As with other packages before, I think the hardest part
is to make the Makefile VPATH aware. I intend to file a patch upstream,
soon-ish. Next step: autopkgtesting.
Regarding packaging: I don't think there's enough flesh to warrant a
-common package, as the per-Pg-package weigh in at around 90K. I'm
considering a separate -doc package, though. (Barely heavier, either.)
Also note that pgtap already is in Debian (well, has been). I contacted
the current maintainer (Pierre Chifflier AKA pollux), but didn't get
feedback on how he prefers me to contribute. Pierre?
Myon: Am I correct that PGAPT needs a git repo to fetch from? Or can we
handle other sources, there?
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Erdman | 2015-05-26 21:09:04 | Fw: Re: pgtap in our apt repo |
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2015-05-26 19:06:11 | Re: pgtap in our apt repo |