From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | CK Tan <cktan(at)vitessedata(dot)com>, Colin 't Hart <colin(at)sharpheart(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Subject: | Re: Order of columns in query is important?! |
Date: | 2015-05-26 10:13:06 |
Message-ID: | 55644732.8050506@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26/05/15 11:59, CK Tan wrote:
> It has to do with the implementation of slot_getattr, which tries to do
> the deform on-demand lazily.
>
> if you do select a,b,c, the execution would do slot_getattr(1) and
> deform a, and then slot_getattr(2) which reparse the tuple to deform b,
> and finally slot_getattr(3), which parse the tuple yet again to deform c.
>
> Where as if you do select c, b, a, it would do slot_getattr(3) to deform
> c, and in the process deform a and b in one pass. Subsequent calls to
> slot_getattr 1 and 2 would find the attribute ready and available, and
> return it (without parsing the tuple again).
>
If this was the case, changing column order would lead to performance
increase, not decrease as reported.
My guess would be same as Amits, it's most likely the additional
projection step.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | CK Tan | 2015-05-26 10:19:20 | Re: Order of columns in query is important?! |
Previous Message | CK Tan | 2015-05-26 09:59:53 | Re: Order of columns in query is important?! |