Re: Required permissions for data directory

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Required permissions for data directory
Date: 2004-10-12 19:09:42
Message-ID: 5560.1097608182@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> For 8.0 are we going to allow group modifications to the data
> directories for PostgreSQL? It is kind of silly that it must be 700.

Not in the least. There are many systems where users by default
are all in a "users" group, and so 770 isn't much safer than 777.

> I think we should allow at least 770. This allows you to have
> administrators with postgresql.conf editing rights without giving
> them the ability to su to postgresql.

Being able to edit postgresql.conf gives one the ability to become
postgres (hint: you can cause the backend to load a shlib of your
choosing, or even more trivially, adjust pg_hba.conf to let you in
as superuser), so the above distinction is unenforceable.

In short: no way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-12 19:14:13 Re: Strange code in initdb
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-10-12 18:51:47 Required permissions for data directory