| From: | "Daniel Verite" <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thorsten Schöning" <tschoening(at)am-soft(dot)de> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Concurrenctly running CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS [...] AS [...] |
| Date: | 2020-06-08 10:07:53 |
| Message-ID: | 555f2665-0880-4d63-9314-b73521b8c5e8@manitou-mail.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> > The caveat you mention about IF NOT EXISTS does not apply to
> > temporary tables, as they're not shared across sessions.[...]
>
> That's what I understood as well, but I'm creating those concurrently
> WITHIN one and the same session and transaction. :-)
But a SQL session on the server takes its statements from a FIFO queue
and processes them serially, so there's no intra-session concurrency.
In fact multi-threaded SQL clients *must* make sure that they don't
send concurrent queries to the same connection. The best they can
do in terms of throughput is to queue up a new query while
the server is busy executing a previous one, but that's pipelining,
not parallelism.
Best regards,
--
Daniel Vérité
PostgreSQL-powered mailer: https://www.manitou-mail.org
Twitter: @DanielVerite
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Laura Smith | 2020-06-08 10:17:07 | Postgres 12 RLS |
| Previous Message | Michaeldba@sqlexec.com | 2020-06-08 09:50:35 | Re: When to use PARTITION BY HASH? |