From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Eric Ridge <e_ridge(at)tcdi(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend |
Date: | 2015-05-22 22:29:03 |
Message-ID: | 555FADAF.1050908@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/22/15 4:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
>> On 5/22/15 3:08 PM, Eric Ridge wrote:
>>> Rather than change the behavior of pg_cancel/terminate_backend(), why not change pg_stat_activity to exclude the current session? Seems like showing a row in pg_stat_activity for "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" is kinda useless anyways.
>
>> Interesting idea. I suspect that would be even more invasive than
>> modifying the functions though...
>
> -1 ... some other columns in pg_stat_activity are potentially useful even
> for the current session, eg session and transaction start times.
AFAICT the only field you can get in pg_stat_activity and nowhere else
is session start time (txn start is always now(), no?).
If that's the only objection about eliminating the current backend from
pg_stat_activity then I'd say we should just add a session_start_time
function to handle that.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-22 22:35:39 | Re: Change pg_cancel_*() to ignore current backend |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-22 21:54:35 | Re: jsonb concatenate operator's semantics seem questionable |