From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Wrong Assert in PageIndexMultiDelete? |
Date: | 2015-05-19 16:20:40 |
Message-ID: | 555B62D8.4070306@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/19/2015 07:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I am trying to create new index access method.
>> And I found strange Assert in PageIndexMultiDelete
>> <http://doxygen.postgresql.org/bufpage_8c_source.html#l00791> function.
>
>> Assert
>> <http://doxygen.postgresql.org/c_8h.html#a706ac5b1a53bd04067f81924b92cb9f6>(nitems
>> < MaxIndexTuplesPerPage
>> <http://doxygen.postgresql.org/itup_8h.html#adb7c94e95ce112eb47d71f7797604ddb>
>> );
>
>> Is '<' sign is correct? I thougt it should be '<='.
>> Is it a bug or just my misunderstanding?
>
> Hm, I think it's a bug. It's probably not very significant because
> MaxIndexTuplesPerPage is an overestimate (it doesn't account for index
> special space), but it's wrong AFAICS.
>
> That Assert hasn't been there very long, either --- seems to have been
> added in 877b0887. Heikki, did you have some specific reason for writing
> it like that?
No, it looks like a bug to me as well. Will fix...
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-19 16:21:26 | Re: errmsg() clobbers errno |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-19 16:15:58 | Re: Wrong Assert in PageIndexMultiDelete? |