From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |
Date: | 2015-05-13 12:15:53 |
Message-ID: | 55534079.70109@iki.fi |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/13/2015 02:12 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> This has had around 2 years of thought at this point. I don't agree it
> needs more thought.
Noted.
> There is one clear use case for this and it is of benefit to many
> distributed architectures.
Right. What's your point?
> I don't see what calamity will occur if we commit this. If you don't want a
> sequence AM, don't ever use this.
I'd like the API to be good for its purpose. Also, I did mention that
the the current patch makes the situation slightly worse for people who
never use this: it makes the log_cnt field non human-readable. That's a
really minor thing, but it shows that it *does* matter how this is
implemented, even if you only ever use the local seq AM.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-13 12:18:04 | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |
Previous Message | Volker Aßmann | 2015-05-13 12:01:38 | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |