| From: | Peter Mogensen <apm(at)one(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comparing txid and xmin (under BDR) |
| Date: | 2015-05-12 07:40:16 |
| Message-ID: | 5551AE60.3000106@one.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2015-05-12 06:06, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 11 May 2015 at 21:10, Peter Mogensen <apm(at)one(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>
>> So ... I can easily get the current txid of the SELECT transaction by
>> calling txid_current().
>>
> Note that by doing so, you force txid allocation for a read-only query that
> might otherwise not need one, which increases your txid burn rate and
> decreases time until you need to do wraparound-protection vacuuming.
>
The same is not true for txid_snapshot_xmin() is it?
I mean ... I really don't need the actual txid of a SELECT statement.
Only to ensure that it's never than any invalidation event.
So it's enough to just use txid_snapshot_xmin() ... at the cost of
possibly not caching new values in a small window after invalidation.
/Peter
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Anil Menon | 2015-05-12 08:07:52 | Re: Why does this SQL work? |
| Previous Message | Wayne E. Seguin | 2015-05-12 06:37:23 | Re: [BDR] Node Join Question |