Re: Standby problem after restore_command Implementation

On 05/05/2015 08:35 AM, Edson F. Lidorio wrote:
> On 05-05-2015 11:22, Melvin Davidson wrote:
>> It's possible you have wal_keep_segments set too low. What happens is
>> that the master will keep the wals ( in your case 20) after processing
>> them, before sending them off to the great black hole in the network
>> (deleting) and making them unavailable to the standby. Try increasing
>> wal_keep_segments = 100.
>>

> Increased thewal_keep_segments=100andkeeps popping upthe same message:

The message did not come through. Also increasing wal_keep_segments only
works for the future, it will not deal with a WAL file that has already
been recycled before the setting was changed.

>
> A question thatI have!
> astheslave servercan seethis folderin themaster?
> /mnt/server/archivedir/
>

So have you tried logging into the standby and then accessing the
directory on the master manually. In other words copy a file from the
master to standby using cp from the standby command line.

> Sorrymy doubtsI'mbasicbeginner!

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com