Re: plpgsql functions organisation

From: Yves Dorfsman <yves(at)zioup(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpgsql functions organisation
Date: 2015-05-04 20:32:14
Message-ID: 5547D74E.5090405@zioup.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

>
> As for performance concerns, in 99% of cases code maintainability is going to
> be way more important than performance microoptimization. If you're *that*
> concerned about performance than plpgsql probably isn't the right answer anyway.

Isn't one of the advantage of running on the server to avoid data round trip?

What would you recommend for better performance?

--
http://yves.zioup.com
gpg: 4096R/32B0F416

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nanker Phelge 2015-05-04 22:06:06 Re: Errors using JDBC batchUpdate with plpgsql function
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-05-04 20:21:50 Re: plpgsql functions organisation