Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CVE-2017-7484-induced bugs, or, btree cmp functions are not leakproof?
Date: 2018-07-10 22:58:05
Message-ID: 5547.1531263485@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> on initdb in v11, see
> https://postgr.es/m/CAKJS1f9cqoSKS9JVcBKGa2mdn-24YPWc9XLzFDNsmjJMUpth1w@mail.gmail.com

[confused...] I recall a thread mentioning that we might need initdb
in v11, but that one doesn't seem to be it?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-07-10 23:58:20 Re: Non-reserved replication slots and slot advancing
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-07-10 22:53:03 Re: possible issue with array type created for every heap relation composite type