| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CTE optimization fence on the todo list? |
| Date: | 2015-05-02 15:18:03 |
| Message-ID: | 5544EAAB.8040305@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/01/2015 07:24 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> O
>> (A possible compromise position would be to offer a new GUC to
>> enable/disable the optimization globally; that would add only a reasonably
>> small amount of control code, and people who were afraid of the change
>> breaking their apps would probably want a global disable anyway.)
> We'd need the GUC. I know of a lot of cases where people are using WITH
> clauses specifically to override the query planner, and requiring them
> to edit all of their queries in order to enable the old behavior would
> become an upgrade barrier.
>
+100
This could be a very bad, almost impossible to catch, behaviour break.
Even if we add the GUC, we're probably going to be imposing very
significant code audit costs on some users.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-05-02 16:18:52 | Re: PATCH: pgbench - merging transaction logs |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-05-02 14:58:03 | Re: pgsql: Add transforms feature |