Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?
Date: 2015-04-19 17:42:12
Message-ID: 5533E8F4.2050400@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 04/19/15 19:16, Jon Dufresne wrote:
> Given the table:
>
> CREATE TABLE dates (id SERIAL, d DATE NOT NULL, t TEXT NOT NULL)
>
> With an *index* on field d. The following two queries are functionally
> equivalent:
>
> 1. SELECT * FROM dates WHERE d >= '1900-01-01'
> 2. SELECT * FROM dates WHERE EXTRACT(year from d) >= 1900'
>
> By functionally equivalent, they will return the same result set.
>
> Query 2 does not use the index, adding a performance cost. It seems
> there is an opportunity for optimization to handle these two queries
> equivalently to take advantage of the index.

Or you might try creating an expression index ...

CREATE INDEX date_year_idx ON dates((extract(year from d)));

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jon Dufresne 2015-04-19 20:10:42 Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?
Previous Message Jon Dufresne 2015-04-19 17:16:29 extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could?