| From: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could? | 
| Date: | 2015-04-19 17:42:12 | 
| Message-ID: | 5533E8F4.2050400@2ndquadrant.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
On 04/19/15 19:16, Jon Dufresne wrote:
> Given the table:
>
> CREATE TABLE dates (id SERIAL, d DATE NOT NULL, t TEXT NOT NULL)
>
> With an *index* on field d. The following two queries are functionally
> equivalent:
>
> 1. SELECT * FROM dates WHERE d >= '1900-01-01'
> 2. SELECT * FROM dates WHERE EXTRACT(year from d) >= 1900'
>
> By functionally equivalent, they will return the same result set.
>
> Query 2 does not use the index, adding a performance cost. It seems
> there is an opportunity for optimization to handle these two queries
> equivalently to take advantage of the index.
Or you might try creating an expression index ...
CREATE INDEX date_year_idx ON dates((extract(year from d)));
regards
--
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jon Dufresne | 2015-04-19 20:10:42 | Re: extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could? | 
| Previous Message | Jon Dufresne | 2015-04-19 17:16:29 | extract(year from date) doesn't use index but maybe could? |