From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ilya Ashchepkov <koctep(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Hot standby problems: consistent state not reached, no connection to master server. |
Date: | 2015-04-12 15:10:48 |
Message-ID: | 552A8AF8.4090401@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 04/12/2015 07:47 AM, Ilya Ashchepkov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I'm setting up hot standby slave.
> It recovers from wal archive files, but I can't connect to it:
> $ psql
> psql: FATAL: the database system is starting up
>
> On master:
> # select name,setting from pg_settings where name like 'wal_level';
> name | setting
> -----------+-------------
> wal_level | hot_standby
>
>
> My slave recovery.conf:
> $ cat recovery.conf
> # Note that recovery.conf must be in $PGDATA directory.
> # It should NOT be located in the same directory as postgresql.conf
>
> # Specifies whether to start the server as a standby. In streaming replication,
> # this parameter must to be set to on.
> standby_mode = 'on'
>
> # Specifies a connection string which is used for the standby server to connect
> # with the primary.
> primary_conninfo = 'host=192.168.0.101 port=5432 user=replication password=*'
>
> # Specifies a trigger file whose presence should cause streaming replication to
> # end (i.e., failover).
> trigger_file = '/media/psqlbak/101/main/standup'
>
> # Specifies a command to load archive segments from the WAL archive. If
> # wal_keep_segments is a high enough number to retain the WAL segments
> # required for the standby server, this may not be necessary. But
> # a large workload can cause segments to be recycled before the standby
> # is fully synchronized, requiring you to start again from a new base backup.
> restore_command = '/usr/lib/postgresql/9.3/bin/pg_standby -t /tmp/pgsql.trigger.5432 /media/psqlbak/101/wals/main/ %f %p %r'
>
> I tried to comment 'restore_command' in recovery.conf on slave, then slave connects
> to master and starts receiving data, but I think it's not very good way.
> What should I change to receive data through connection and reach consistent
> state on slave?
What have you set for hot_standby on the standby server?:
>
>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ilya Ashchepkov | 2015-04-12 15:25:36 | Re: Hot standby problems: consistent state not reached, no connection to master server. |
Previous Message | Ilya Ashchepkov | 2015-04-12 14:47:52 | Hot standby problems: consistent state not reached, no connection to master server. |