| From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |
| Date: | 2015-04-08 12:24:53 |
| Message-ID: | 55251E15.6030704@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/04/15 14:22, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-04-08 14:17:04 +0200, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> And you guys are not getting my point. What I proposed was to not reuse the
>> RI id immediately because that can make debugging issues with
>> replication/conflict handling harder when something happens after cluster
>> configuration has changed.
>
> If that's the goal, you shouldn't delete the replication identifier at
> that point. That's the only sane way preventing it from being reused.
>
Ok, I am happy with that solution.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-04-08 12:29:26 | Re: Re: File count restriction of directory limits number of relations inside a database. |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-04-08 12:22:29 | Re: Replication identifiers, take 4 |