Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index
Date: 2015-03-31 18:19:40
Message-ID: 551AE53C.3020709@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 03/31/2015 10:58 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
>>> very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
>>> the trouble anymore. If someone has runs into that issue frequently, he
>>> probably should just upgrade to 9.4.
>>
>> Ouch. That is a really poor way to look at this.
>
> I don't agree. When a bug fix is really invasive, there is a
> considerable risk that it will itself have bugs.

Absolutely.

> We've got to balance
> the risk of fixing things for users who are currently having problems
> with the risk of creating problems for people who currently aren't
> having any.
>

We are not in disagreement.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-03-31 18:21:07 Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-03-31 18:19:15 Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index