| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: RDS announcement |
| Date: | 2015-03-29 03:17:50 |
| Message-ID: | 55176EDE.5010809@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 3/18/15 5:03 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What constitutes an advertisement?
>
> The primary test here is whether the information provided would be of
> some use even to people who have no interest in the commercial product
> mentioned. Consider what your entry would look like if all references to
> the product were removed. If there's no useful PostgreSQL content left
> after doing that, that post is an ad.
>
> While it isn't an ad, when you remove the reference to the product,
> there isn't anything left. I think a post would also fail on the
> "relevant to the PostgreSQL community".
I think this just shows that that definition of advertisement is flawed.
Under those rules, even a product recall would be an advertisement.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-03-30 17:48:41 | Re: RDS announcement |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-03-28 14:11:51 | Re: Please drop the sfpug@postgresql.org mailing list |