Re: Test CMake build

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Test CMake build
Date: 2016-02-11 19:37:12
Message-ID: 551.1455219432@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Yury Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Really? That sure seems misleading as can be, and not something we'd
>> want to be part of a new user's very first impression of Postgres.

> In configure we have similar messages:
> checking for int8... no
> checking for uint8... no
> checking for int64... no
> checking for uint64... no

Hm, well, configure does not use the word "failed" to describe expected
cases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Roxanne Reid-Bennett 2016-02-11 20:39:44 Re: ERROR: missing FROM-clause entry for table
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2016-02-11 19:29:18 Re: fast refresh materialized view