Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website

From: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Holger(dot)Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis(at)it(dot)nrw(dot)de, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website
Date: 2015-03-18 17:11:23
Message-ID: 5509B1BB.4000306@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On 3/18/2015 12:48 PM, Holger(dot)Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis(at)it(dot)nrw(dot)de wrote:
> John Scalia wrote on Wednesday, March 18, 2015 5:07 PM:
>> Or is some major flaw with 9.3.3 that should motivate us to get off it immediately?
> Consider this:
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1328517318.859752.1424472489522.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
> "Oh, and please update to 9.3.6; there are some nasty bugs fixed."
Yikes, I see what you mean, even though we haven't experienced any issues with 9.3.3. You should all know that I personally have no problem upgrading at all and I've even put 9.4.0
into a sandbox just to satisfy my own curiosity. The problem here is more political, including the fact that Verizon is trying to migrate off of postgresql. I'm reasonably certain
if I say to migrate to a newer version, the suggestion will get canned, and the order come down to start using NuoDB instead.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim Gündüz 2015-03-18 17:27:59 Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website
Previous Message Holger.Friedrich-Fa-Trivadis 2015-03-18 16:48:15 Re: Version on the yum.postgresql.org website