Re: Reduce pinning in btree indexes

On 3/16/15 11:47 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> I am sure there are more sophisticated things to be done here, but I
> guess my feeling is that time is a good way to go here for a first cut
> - lots of people have suggested it, and there's clearly a use case for
> it. If the setting turns out to be popular, we can fine-tune it more
> once we've got some experience with it. But I'm nervous about trying
> to to design something more complicated than that right now,
> especially so late in the release cycle. We know that this setting,
> with time-based units, will meet the needs of the customer for whom it
> was developed, and that is a good-enough reason to think that time is
> a reasonable metric for this, even if we eventually have others.

+1. As you said, time is easy for people to understand, and I think it
will handle a large chunk of the use cases.

I used to have this quote (or something close to it) on my whiteboard...
I think it's appropriate here ;)

"The perfect is the enemy of the good. -Simon Riggs"
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com