From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Date: | 2015-03-13 04:37:11 |
Message-ID: | 55026977.40205@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 13-03-2015 AM 10:24, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
>> From Robert's description[1], it looked like the NestLoop with Funnel
> would
>> have Funnel as either outer plan or topmost plan node or NOT a
> parameterised
>> plan. In that case, would this case arise or am I missing something?
>>
>
> Probably not if the costing is right and user doesn't manually disable
> plans (like by set enable_* = off). However we should have rescan code
> incase it chooses the plan such that Funnel is inner node and I think
> apart from that also in few cases Rescan is required.
>
I see, thanks.
By the way, is it right that TupleQueueFunnel.queue has one shm_mq_handle per
initialized parallel worker? If so, how does TupleQueueFunnel.maxqueues relate
to ParallelContext.nworkers (of the corresponding parallel context)?
Why I asked this is because in CreateTupleQueueFunnel():
funnel->maxqueues = 8;
funnel->queue = palloc(funnel->maxqueues * sizeof(shm_mq_handle *));
So, is the hardcoded "8" intentional or an oversight?
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2015-03-13 04:52:36 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2015-03-13 02:46:08 | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns |