Re: VACUUM FULL doesn't reduce table size

On 03/11/2015 08:52 AM, pinker wrote:
> Adrian Klaver-4 wrote
>> Also per Kevin Grittner and Tom Lane there
>> is a Nabble issue at work where the list here is not seeing all the
>> information. Example:
>
> It's because I edited some post. Then is visible only on nabble because
> edited version isn't sent back to the mailing list.

Per previous suggestions I would post to this(pgsql-general) list
directly. Hidden information is not to going to be well received here
and will impede an answer to your issue, just saying.

>
>
> Adrian Klaver-4 wrote
>> Also per Kevin Grittner we are looking at a moving target, so some sort
>> of information about current state would be helpful.
>
> I'm doing pg_dump from snapshot - on production that isn't possible. Today
> at night my colleague will run vacuum full verbose on this table in
> production environment, so we will see if this problem occurs only on
> snapshot or was replicated from production.

Alright.

>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://postgresql.nabble.com/VACUUM-FULL-doesn-t-reduce-table-size-tp5840782p5841434.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com