From: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | DAVID Nicolas <nicolas(dot)david(at)hexagon(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Open source licenses |
Date: | 2021-04-06 14:12:30 |
Message-ID: | 54ee998d1ea330d6eee0a0ad68fbd5adcddd64b6.camel@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 13:47 +0000, DAVID Nicolas wrote:
> My concern is, I guess, the same for all the software editor using opensource components.
>
> It is to make an inventory of all the used opensource licenses from all the used components,
> to check and respect the terms of use, to preserve copyrights and intellectual property.
>
> However, when I get PostgreSql binaries for Windows (Zip archive linked to
> https://www.enterprisedb.com/download-postgresql-binaries) I can see in installation-notes.html :
> -> "The software bundled together in this package is released under a number of different
> Open Source licences. By using any component of this installation package, you agree to abide
> by the terms and conditions of it's licence."
>
> Could the PostgreSQL Global Development Group consider to provide these information ?
> Is there a team or a group in charge of this ? Is there a direct email address to ask this
> kind of request ?
These installation packages are provided by EnterpriseDB, not by the PGDG.
I think your request is reasonable, but you'll have to ask the packager.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais | 2021-04-06 15:46:32 | Re: questions about wraparound |
Previous Message | DAVID Nicolas | 2021-04-06 13:47:35 | RE: Open source licenses |