Re: wiki.postgresql.org is awfully slow this evening

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Dave Page wrote:

> No we haven't - not even remotely. At a rough count we'd need at least
> another 17 servers (based on the current number of VMs), and we'd lose
> the ability to move services between hardware quickly and easily. Oh,
> and we'd have the management headache of dealing with a bunch more
> hosting providers, as I doubt the current ones will give us that many
> boxes.

Well, maybe we don't need to replace all 17, just some of the more
active ones.

Joshua points out:

> That being said :) I think its a mistake. It would be a complete waste
> of resources to go to dedicated machines. Some of the machines we have
> we hardly use at this point.

Fair enough, I withdraw the dedicated box request. Can we perhaps separate
the wiki then, so we don't have a repeat of yesterday? Maybe put wiki
or git onto one of the more lightly loaded physical boxes?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200809041059
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAki/+DoACgkQvJuQZxSWSsj22QCfZlZQ4XoxYxo+UOxXAjNeKdio
UecAoOPRoRN8EPKhgTGRINzjnAxXOJNd
=MNYh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----