From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, mhwood(at)ameritech(dot)net |
Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #14912: Undocumented: 'psql -l' assumes database 'postgresql' not $USER |
Date: | 2018-02-02 21:49:44 |
Message-ID: | 54c57675-f673-3f8e-d7d7-b5c61943f9fc@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 11/16/17 16:27, David G. Johnston wrote:
> List all available databases, then exit. Other non-connection
> - options are ignored. This is similar to the meta-command
> + options are ignored. If an explicit database name is not
> + found the <literal>postgres</literal> database, not the user's,
> + will be targeted for connection. This is similar to the meta-command
> <command>\list</command>.
What does "an explicit database name is not found" mean? How does one
find an explicit database name?
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2018-02-02 22:05:36 | Re: BUG #14912: Undocumented: 'psql -l' assumes database 'postgresql' not $USER |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2018-02-02 20:15:23 | Re: BUG #14952: COPY fails to fill in IDENTITY column default value |