On 06-03-2015 AM 09:30, Tom Lane wrote:
> Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>
>> One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)
>
> Hm, but then you'd have "user mapping for foo for server bar", which
> doesn't read so nicely either.
>
Yeah, I had totally missed the "for foo" part; I was thinking of it as "of foo".
By the way, in this case, is "foo" the name/id of a local user or does it
really refer to some "foo on the remote server"?
Thanks,
Amit