On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> appendStringInfo(&buffer, _("user mapping for %s in server %s"), usename,
>> srv->servername);
>
> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
> word here. "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".
>
One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)
Thanks,
Amit