Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server
Date: 2015-03-02 17:59:18
Message-ID: 54F4A4F6.2050003@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


On 03/02/2015 12:58 AM, damien clochard wrote:

> I totally understand that for someone who wants to launch a PUG in
> his/her area, opening a mailing list is not just about getting a
> communication tool: it's a gesture of recognition. It means you're part
> of the family. It's having the people you admire telling you : "go for
> it ! here's your tool !"
>
> In my opinion, the community should either make it very easy to open a
> new PUG mailing-list or simply refuse to create new ones and tell people
> to go elsewhere.

+1 including current user group lists.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, @cmdpromptinc

Now I get it: your service is designed for a customer
base that grew up with Facebook, watches Japanese seizure
robot anime, and has the attention span of a gnat.
I'm not that user., "Tyler Riddle"

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-03-02 18:37:42 Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server
Previous Message damien clochard 2015-03-02 08:58:45 Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server