From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Old version markup for wiki |
Date: | 2015-02-25 23:13:31 |
Message-ID: | 54EE571B.6060704@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 2/25/15 4:18 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Jim Nasby wrote:
>> On 2/25/15 3:56 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Jim Nasby wrote:
>>>> There are places where we mark warnings or notes about old versions of
>>>> PG, and it'd be nice to have a consistent template for this.
>>>
>>> Feel free.
>>
>> Working on it.
>>
>> Do we have any bots running?
>
> Not that I know of, but Stefan would know for sure.
>
>> I'll make a pass through and templatify version stuff, but it'd be
>> nice if we could throw a notice at users in the future to use
>> templates instead of bare references.
>
> mumble.
Yeah, after looking at this it looks like the only place it could
reasonable be used without a bot is in Template:SnippetInfo, and that
would still require modifying the original references. It would have
been nice to have a canonical way to reference PG versions, but at this
point I don't think it's worth it unless someone in the general user
community wants to tackle it.
Sorry for the noise.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-02-27 00:36:00 | Re: Policy for expiring lists WAS: Idea for a secondary list server |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-02-25 22:18:22 | Re: Old version markup for wiki |