Re: Enforce creation of destination folders for source files in pg_regress (Was: pg_regress writes into source tree)

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enforce creation of destination folders for source files in pg_regress (Was: pg_regress writes into source tree)
Date: 2015-02-22 15:00:28
Message-ID: 54E9EF0C.3070408@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2/22/15 5:41 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> You could argue that these .gitignore files don't actually belong there,
>> but your patch doesn't change or move those files, and even modules that
>> have non-empty sql/ or expected/ directories have .gitignore files
>> there, so it is considered the appropriate location.
>
> This is up to the maintainer of each extension to manage their code
> tree. However I can imagine that some people would be grateful if we
> allow them to not need sql/ and expected/ containing only one single
> .gitignore file ignoring everything with "*", making the code tree of
> their extensions cleaner.

I would like to have an extension in tree that also does this, so we
have a regression test of this functionality.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2015-02-22 15:03:59 Re: Replication identifiers, take 4
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-22 14:58:31 Re: hash agg is slower on wide tables?