From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | inspector morse <inspectormorse86(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: stored procedure variable names |
Date: | 2015-02-20 01:44:12 |
Message-ID: | 54E6916C.5010501@aklaver.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 02/19/2015 04:57 PM, inspector morse wrote:
> In all other DBMS, the variable names have a distinctive character to
> differentiate between variables and column names:
>
> Example:
> SQL Server uses @
> MySql uses ?
> Oracle uses :
> Firebirdsql uses :
>
> It makes it easier to write and manage queries especially in stored
> procedures.
>
> Just compare the below:
> create stored procedure get_user_for_editing(user_id int, out username
> varchar)
> begin
> select username into @username from users where user_id = @user_id;
> end;
>
> to this mess:
>
> create stored procedure get_user_for_editing(user_id int, out username
> varchar)
> begin
> select u.username into get_user_for_editing.username from users u
> where get_user_for_editing.user_id = get_user_for_editing.user_id;
> end;
>
First Postgres does not have stored procedures, but user defined
functions, so the above is a no-op right from the start.
Second I have no idea where you are pulling get_user_for_editing.* from?
Third, which of the Postgres procedural languages are you having an
issue with?
> Prefixing the variables (ex: p_user_id) makes the application code
> harder to write as we have a lot of dynamic code that is expecting
> "user_id" instead of "p_user_id".
>
> Is there any plan to add a character to differentiate between variables?
In what procedural language?
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | inspector morse | 2015-02-20 01:47:04 | Re: stored procedure variable names |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-20 01:28:33 | Re: stored procedure variable names |