From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
Cc: | Arne Scheffer <arne(dot)scheffer(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |
Date: | 2015-02-17 02:05:13 |
Message-ID: | 54E2A1D9.9000903@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17/02/15 02:57, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 02/16/2015 08:48 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
>> On 17/02/15 01:57, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> We definitely want this feature, I wished to have this info many times.
>>>
>>> I would still like to see a benchmark.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Average of 3 runs of read-only pgbench on my system all with
>> pg_stat_statement activated:
>> HEAD: 20631
>> SQRT: 20533
>> SQRTD: 20592
>>
>>
>
>
> So using sqrtd the cost is 0.18%. I think that's acceptable.
>
I think so too.
I found one more issue with the 1.2--1.3 upgrade script, the DROP
FUNCTION pg_stat_statements(); should be DROP FUNCTION
pg_stat_statements(bool); since in 1.2 the function identity has changed.
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-02-17 02:07:34 | Re: We do not need pg_promote_v4_to_v6_addr/mask |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-02-17 02:03:45 | Re: Add min and max execute statement time in pg_stat_statement |