Re: Is "IF EXISTS" legit in "ALTER TABLE ... RENAME"?

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>
To: Ken Winter <ken(at)sunward(dot)org>, PostgreSQL List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is "IF EXISTS" legit in "ALTER TABLE ... RENAME"?
Date: 2015-02-16 21:44:06
Message-ID: 54E264A6.20101@aklaver.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 02/16/2015 01:33 PM, Ken Winter wrote:
> According to the PG 9.1 doc
> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-altertable.html)

The above is the 9.4 version of the page, note the "current" in the URL.

This is the 9.1 version of the page:

http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html

so:

ALTER TABLE name
RENAME TO new_name

> this is a valid flavor of ALTER TABLE:
>
> ALTER TABLE [ IF EXISTS ]name
> RENAME TOnew_name
>
> But when I try to execute such a command, I get:
>
> ERROR: syntax error at or near "EXISTS"
> LINE 1: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS event
> ^
> QUERY: ALTER TABLE IF EXISTS event
> RENAME TO event_s;
> CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function "convert_table_to_history" line 60 at
> EXECUTE statement
>
> As you'll see, in this case the command was issued from a function. But
> issuing it directly evokes the same error.
>
> ?!?

>
> ~ Thanks in advance
> ~ Ken

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel LaMotte 2015-02-17 11:11:16 Re: Issue dumping schema using readonly user
Previous Message Ken Winter 2015-02-16 21:33:19 Is "IF EXISTS" legit in "ALTER TABLE ... RENAME"?