Re: For cursors, there is FETCH and MOVE, why no TELL?

From: Marc Balmer <marc(at)msys(dot)ch>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: For cursors, there is FETCH and MOVE, why no TELL?
Date: 2015-02-09 22:16:55
Message-ID: 54D931D7.5080400@msys.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am 09.02.15 um 13:13 schrieb Hakan Kocaman:
> Hi,
>
> 2015-02-09 10:37 GMT+01:00 Marc Balmer <marc(at)msys(dot)ch <mailto:marc(at)msys(dot)ch>>:
>
>
> (I use cursors to display large datasets in a page-wise way, where the
> user can move per-page, or, when displaying a single record, per record.
> When the user goes back from per-record view to page-view, I have to
> restore the cursor to the position it was on before the user changed to
> per-record view.)
>
>
> On a totaly unrelated note:
> http://use-the-index-luke.com/de/blog/2013-07/pagination-done-the-postgresql-way

yes, totally unrelated, indeed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2015-02-09 22:23:06 Re: Odd behavior of updatable security barrier views on foreign tables
Previous Message Ravi Kiran 2015-02-09 21:29:04 enabling nestedloop and disabling hashjon