From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Guillaume Drolet <droletguillaume(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup |
Date: | 2015-02-09 21:10:22 |
Message-ID: | 54D9223E.4040405@BlueTreble.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2/9/15 11:51 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> According to this page
> <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/cc704588.aspx>, exception
> 0xC0000005 means STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION - The instruction at 0x%08lx
> referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s. This is not of
> much help to me.
In my experience that means that your data is corrupted.
> I hope these additional bits of information can help someone figuring
> out a solution to get my cluster up and running again.
>
> PS. I was thinking of reinstalling PGSQL over my current install but
> keeping my PGDATA. I've done it in the past for fixing problems with
> starting the service and it worked. What do you think?
You could try it, but as Guillaume Drolet mentioned I don't see this
helping.
Since this is happening on your original database, I suspect that's
what's been corrupted. In my experience, this means you either have
faulty hardware, or there's a misconfiguration that means fsync isn't
doing what it's supposed to do.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Guillaume Drolet | 2015-02-09 21:35:54 | Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-02-09 20:42:21 | Re: Question on session_replication_role |