Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Guillaume Drolet <droletguillaume(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup
Date: 2015-02-09 21:10:22
Message-ID: 54D9223E.4040405@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2/9/15 11:51 AM, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> According to this page
> <https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/cc704588.aspx>, exception
> 0xC0000005 means STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION - The instruction at 0x%08lx
> referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s. This is not of
> much help to me.

In my experience that means that your data is corrupted.

> I hope these additional bits of information can help someone figuring
> out a solution to get my cluster up and running again.
>
> PS. I was thinking of reinstalling PGSQL over my current install but
> keeping my PGDATA. I've done it in the past for fixing problems with
> starting the service and it worked. What do you think?

You could try it, but as Guillaume Drolet mentioned I don't see this
helping.

Since this is happening on your original database, I suspect that's
what's been corrupted. In my experience, this means you either have
faulty hardware, or there's a misconfiguration that means fsync isn't
doing what it's supposed to do.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Drolet 2015-02-09 21:35:54 Re: Cluster seems broken after pg_basebackup
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-02-09 20:42:21 Re: Question on session_replication_role