Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client
Date: 2015-02-06 09:46:01
Message-ID: 54D48D59.1040602@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/06/2015 10:38 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> Looking again at the code after Andres' interrupt-handling patch series, I
>> got confused by the fact that there are several wait-retry loops in
>> different layers, and reading and writing works slightly differently.
>>
>> I propose the attached, which pulls all the wait-retry logic up to
>> secure_read() and secure_write(). This makes the code a lot more
>> understandable.
>
> Are you sure that it is a good idea to move the check of port->noblock
> out of be_tls_[read|write] to an upper level? ISTM that we should set
> errno and n to respectively EWOULDBLOCK and -1 in be_tls_[write|read]
> when port->noblock and do nothing otherwise. In your patch those
> values are set even if the port is in block mode.

It simplifies the code to do all the sleeping and interrupt handling
code in the upper level, in secure_[read|write]. Do you see a problem
with it?

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-02-06 09:50:21 Re: Simplify sleeping while reading/writing from client
Previous Message Andreas Karlsson 2015-02-06 09:38:21 Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL