Re: BUG #12670: Can't create postgis extension in single-user mode

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: <warrior2031(at)mail(dot)ru>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #12670: Can't create postgis extension in single-user mode
Date: 2015-01-28 07:16:23
Message-ID: 54C88CC7.7030204@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 01/28/2015 03:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Now, I'll agree that if you just intend to install a couple of simple
> extensions, you might be able to get away with doing that much without
> any background support processes. But it's not a mode meant for
> routine activity. And I rather wonder why you need to install
> extensions in that way anyway.

Using the single-user mode for installing extensions etc. is a sensible
idea; or was if it worked. It'd be nice to run initdb, install
extensions, even load data etc. all in single-user mode, before opening
up the cluster for connections. Sure, you can hack pg_hba.conf /
postgresql.conf to keep the real users away until you're done with the
setup, but it's more hassle than just using the single-user mode.

We had discussions some time ago about teaching the backend to speak the
regular FE/BE protocol in single-user mode, and having libpq "connect"
to that. That would still be nice...

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Gould 2015-01-28 10:09:54 Re: Infinite loop in GetMultiXactIdMembers() on 9.3.5 (involves pg_upgrade)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-01-28 03:56:43 Re: Infinite loop in GetMultiXactIdMembers() on 9.3.5 (involves pg_upgrade)