From: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/pgSQL — "commit" illegal in the executable section of a block statement that has an exception section |
Date: | 2019-10-01 01:40:58 |
Message-ID: | 54C2FEA5-86FF-4A3C-A84B-4470A6998ACA@thebuild.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 30, 2019, at 15:37, Bryn Llewellyn <bryn(at)yugabyte(dot)com> wrote:
> I wrote up the problem here:
>
> https://github.com/yugabyte/yugabyte-db/issues/2464
This is documented; it's the very last line of the page you reference in the Github issue:
A transaction cannot be ended inside a block with exception handlers.
Your discussion doesn't answer the specific issue: BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END in pl/pgSQL is implemented by savepoints. What semantics should COMMIT / ROLLBACK have inside of that? Doing a COMMIT / ROLLBACK (at the database level) at that point would lose the savepoints, which would break the BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END semantics.
It's not clear to me what the alternative semantics would be. Can you propose specific database behavior for a COMMIT or ROLLBACK inside a BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END block which retain the savepoint behavior of BEGIN/EXCEPTION/END?
--
-- Christophe Pettus
xof(at)thebuild(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Guo | 2019-10-01 02:08:10 | Re: Two pg_rewind patches (auto generate recovery conf and ensure clean shutdown) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-10-01 01:40:06 | Re: subscriptionCheck failures on nightjar |