From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL |
Date: | 2015-01-22 22:42:37 |
Message-ID: | 54C17CDD.6040504@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/22/2015 02:09 PM, David Johnston wrote:
> The proposal provides for SQL access to all possible sources of
> variable value setting and, ideally, a means of ordering them in
> priority order, so that a search for TimeZone would return two records,
> one for postgresql.auto.conf and one for postgresql.conf - which are
> numbered 1 and 2 respectively - so that in looking at that result if the
> postgresql.auto.conf entry were to be removed the user would know that
> what the value is in postgresql.conf that would become active.
> Furthermore, if postgresql.conf has a setting AND there is a mapping in
> an #included file that information would be accessible via SQL as well.
Wow. Um, I can't imagine any use for that which would justify the
overhead. And I'm practically the "settings geek".
Note that a single file can have multiple copies of the same GUC, plus
there's GUCs set interactively, as well as in the user and database
properties. So you're looking at a lot of different "versions".
I think you're in a position of needing to interest someone else in this
issue enough to produce a patch to argue about. I'm not seeing a lot of
interest in it here.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-01-22 22:51:53 | Re: Windows buildfarm animals are still not happy with abbreviated keys patch |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-01-22 22:32:26 | Re: WITH CHECK and Column-Level Privileges |