Re: Simple Atomic Relationship Insert

From: Roxanne Reid-Bennett <rox(at)tara-lu(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple Atomic Relationship Insert
Date: 2015-01-19 06:33:23
Message-ID: 54BCA533.8050807@tara-lu.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 1/16/2015 2:41 AM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> On 1/15/15 10:57 PM, Roxanne Reid-Bennett wrote:
>>
>> try this: (if you still get deadlocks, uncomment the advisory lock
>> [thanks Daniel] and try again)
>> Logically I suppose it might run faster to do the select, then insert
>> "if". I almost always write these as insert first - because it's the
>> more restrictive lock.
>>
>> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION select_hometown_id(hometown_name VARCHAR)
>> RETURNS
>> INTEGER AS
>> $BODY$
>> DECLARE
>> v_id integer;
>> BEGIN
>> -- perform pg_advisory_xact_lock(hashtext(hometown_name));
>> BEGIN
>> insert into hometowns (name)
>> select hometown_name where not exists (select id from
>> hometowns where name = hometown_name)
>> returning id into v_id;
>
> That has a race condition. The only safe way to do this (outside of
> SSI) is using the example code at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/plpgsql-control-structures.html#PLPGSQL-ERROR-TRAPPING

And if the advisory lock is used? That presumably creates an exclusive
lock on the asset "hometown_name". [in most examples given "Portland,
OR".] Would not any other process that runs (this function) on the same
asset have to wait for this specific transaction to commit or roll back
- blocking the race condition?

Roxanne
(sorry, I was out of town)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Sewell 2015-01-19 07:13:06 Re: Partitioning
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-01-19 06:09:52 Re: Partitioning