| From: | Bosco Rama <postgres(at)boscorama(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alexis Meneses <alexis(dot)meneses(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christopher BROWN <brown(at)reflexe(dot)fr>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql 9.4 / JSONB / JDBC |
| Date: | 2014-12-22 18:33:12 |
| Message-ID: | 549863E8.2080100@boscorama.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On 12/22/14 10:15, Dave Cramer wrote:
> On 22 December 2014 at 13:14, Bosco Rama <postgres(at)boscorama(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> IIRC, there is both a conversion module for, and an actual
>> implementation of, javax.json (aka JSR-353) available for Jackson.
>>
>
> Is this going to make it in? I seem to recall this was being pulled. That
> being said it is still a better starting point than anything else ?
Their big issue with the JSR was that it doesn't do data-binding, which
is one of the major things about Jackson. Hence it will probably never
make it into the 'core'. The JSR support is provided via add-on data
type support. The question may become: Does the driver want to support
data-binding too?
Another issue that may need considering is that once a javax.json item
is 'built' it is immutable. I'm not sure how that would benefit/hinder
the driver.
HTH,
Bosco.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Christopher BROWN | 2014-12-22 19:14:49 | Re: Postgresql 9.4 / JSONB / JDBC |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2014-12-22 18:15:52 | Re: Postgresql 9.4 / JSONB / JDBC |