Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Date: 2010-02-03 04:38:33
Message-ID: 549.1265171913@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Yeah the both is gross. How about:
> plperl.on_plperl_init
> plperl.on_plperlu_init
> plperl.on_init ?

I like the first two. The problem of selecting a good name for the
third one is easily solved: don't have it. What would it be except
a headache and a likely security problem?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alex Hunsaker 2010-02-03 05:13:06 Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-02-03 04:38:03 Streaming replication and SSL